''A True-to-Life James Bond Villain''

To contact us Click HERE
From Strategic Culture
By Wayne Madsen

''Forget Dr. No, Goldfinger, and James Bond’s most recent enemy, Raoul Silva, a cyber-terrorist who can collapse economies and alter elections with a few computer keystrokes. The world’s most dangerous man to fair elections is not a James Bond villain, but the international frontier-hopping Hungarian known as Gyorgy Schwartz, also known as George Soros, the international currency manipulator and democracy troublemaker. Replace the letter «S» in his last name with dollar signs and one is left with «oro», the Spanish and Italian word for gold. The name «SOROS» is worthy of any arch-villain created by Ian Fleming to be Bond’s nemesis. ''

read more

''The Australian Dollar: A Global Currency?''

To contact us Click HERE
From The Diplomat
By Anthony Fensom
 

''Australia has long prided itself on “punching above its weight” in global sporting contests such as the Olympics. Now, the resource-rich nation of 22.6 million people and the world’s 12^th biggest economy may see its currency do the same, with the Australian dollar forecast to join the world’s elite.

Once derided as the “Pacific peso,” the Australian dollar may by 2015 become an official global reserve currency, adding to underlying demand for a currency already considered overvalued by the nation’s exporters.''

read more 

''Tired of Service Cuts, California Cities Raise Taxes''

To contact us Click HERE
From Governing.com

''Have cities reached the limit when it comes to cutting services? That seems to be the case in California where voters passed 71 percent of local tax and bond measures, according to Michael Coleman, fiscal policy advisor for the League of California Cities. Dig a little deeper and you will find that 80 percent of city general tax measures passed on election night.''

read more 

''Yuan hailed as the world reserve currency''

To contact us Click HERE
From SCMP

''Now two academics, Arvind Subramanian and Martin Kessler of the respected Peterson Institute for International Economics, have developed a formula, which claims that the yuan already has taken over from the US dollar as the most important reference currency over large areas of Asia.

They contend that "in East Asia, there is already a renminbi bloc, because the renminbi has become the dominant reference currency, eclipsing the dollar … seven currencies out of 10 co-move more closely with the renminbi than with the dollar.''

read more 

''The Japanese Are About To Enter The Gold Market In Size''

To contact us Click HERE
From King World News

.........''But it seems to me that the Japanese are close to some sort of agreement on weakening the yen.  This will spur demand for gold from the Japanese public.  Up to now the Japanese have been relatively quiet when it comes to gold, but I think things are stirring.  If you look at the gold price in yen, it’s right back to the highs from February.  So gold has had a good run as the yen has weakened.''

read more 

Here's the Answer: GERMANY, Not Greece, Should Exit the Euro

To contact us Click HERE

By Dr. Steve Sjuggerud

Monday, July 2, 2012

 
German taxpayers shouldn't bail out their neighbors…

Instead, Germany should consider leaving the euro.

Over the weekend, Germany's neighbors convinced Germany to sign on for even more help. The Europeans agreed on having a pan-European Banking Union. The idea is that all of Europe would bail out European banks when necessary. The reality is, Germany will be the one saving the others.

Instead of being forced into that position, Germany should consider stepping out of the euro itself.


It comes down to who is actually in the euro. Based on the size of their economies, Germany, France, and the five "PIIGS" nations (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece, and Spain) make up over 80% of the euro.

All of these countries are in trouble, except Germany.

You already know about Greece and the other PIIGS… but France will soon be in trouble, too…

You see, France has a new President, François Hollande. Mr. Hollande was a key figure over the weekend in forcing Germany to help the weaker countries. Take a look at Mr. Hollande's plans (according to The Economist):

Mr. Hollande will start by cutting the retirement age for some workers to 60, putting the top marginal income-tax rate up to 75%, raising taxes on wealth, inheritance and dividends, increasing the minimum wage and making it much harder for employers to fire workers.

Far from curbing the size of the public sector, at 56% of GDP the biggest in the euro zone, he seems likely to expand it.

The thing is, if Mr. Hollande follows through with these plans, France could be a bigger mess than Greece and the rest of the PIIGS in no time… Heck, with French public debt at 90% of the country's GDP, it won't take long for France to catch up with the PIIGS.

So the big question is, why should German taxpayers work hard and eventually pay to bail out guys with plans like Mr. Hollande's? They shouldn't…

Again, as measured by the size of their economies, these seven countries make up over 80% of the euro. Only one of these countries – Germany – has its act together. It appears that the other countries are incapable of making the necessary changes.

So why should we prolong Europe's euro crisis indefinitely?

The answer to the problem is relatively simple: Germany, not Greece, should exit the euro…

I wish I had a nifty trade for you on all of this mess… like buying German government bonds, for example. But unfortunately, the land mines are too big whichever way you turn. (If you bought German government bonds denominated in euros, for example, and Germany left the euro, would those bonds stay in euros? I don't know.)

In sum, the quickest, simplest solution for Europe is right under their noses… It's for Germany, not Greece, to leave the euro.

Coke's thirst for emerging market expansion has yet to be quenched.

To contact us Click HERE

by Thomas Mullarkey, CFA

Coca-Cola KO and its local bottling partners plan on investing an additional $3 billion in India through 2020. This investment, combined with prior commitments, means that from 2012 to 2020, the Coca-Cola system will invest $5 billion in India. Much of the investment will go toward adding capacity, expanding its distribution network, and rolling out more cold-drink equipment. We believe that success in India is critical for Coca-Cola's desire to achieve its 2020 vision to roughly double its global volumes. While the details of this investment are new, the concept is not. In order to double systemwide sales by 2020, we have long believed that the company would need to significantly invest in emerging and developing countries. Consequently, we are maintaining our $73 fair value estimate on Coke shares.While India is home to 1.2 billion people (17% of the world's population), its citizens consume far fewer Coca-Cola products than the rest of the world. While the average American consumes on average 400 Coca-Cola products per year, the average Brazilian drinks 230 servings, and the typical Chinese has 38 servings per year; the average Indian drinks only around 12 eight-ounce servings of Coca-Cola products annually. This is well below the global average of roughly 90 servings per person per year. Coca-Cola India has grown case volumes in the country for over 5 years. While the company's Thumbs Up and Sprite brands are India's top-selling soft drinks, the Coca-Cola brand is seeing healthy growth, with volumes up 27% during the most recent quarter. Additionally, Coca-Cola's Maaza brand is India's best-selling juice drink.
Thesis 04/17/12Coca-Cola's wide economic moat is bolstered by its extensive distribution network, which enables the company to deliver its products to consumers in more than 200 countries, as well as its bevy of powerhouse brands. While declining consumption of carbonated beverages in North America will serve as a near-term headwind for Coke, we believe international markets will provide plenty of growth opportunities over the long term. Absent any strategic missteps, we view Coca-Cola as a safe haven in an uncertain economic environment given that the firm has one of the widest moats in our consumer coverage universe. Even though Coke's existing distribution network spans the globe, the company continues to invest for international growth. The company and its bottling partners intend to invest billions over the next few years in countries such as China, Russia, and Brazil, where per capita consumption is increasing in light of the burgeoning middle class. For example, annual per capita consumption of Coca-Cola products in China is just 38 servings, versus eight servings in 1998, and versus 403 servings in the U.S. We think that these investments will build out the firm's manufacturing and distribution footprint to such an extent that it would be too costly for a new entrant to duplicate, further solidifying the sustainability of the firm's competitive advantages.Over the last decade, tastes have changed in mature markets as consumers have shifted from purchasing carbonated soda to still beverages such as juices, ready-to-drink teas and coffees, and enhanced water. To mitigate this falling volume and maintain share, Coca-Cola has been forced to broaden its portfolio deeper into various still beverage categories, which has enabled the beverage giant to leverage its vast distribution system and marketing might to continue to grow its worldwide volumes.The pressure on bottlers' margins and the demands of the syrup makers for distribution and production flexibility have been sources of conflict for many years. Consequently, Coke followed PepsiCo's PEP lead by acquiring the North American operations of Coca-Cola Enterprises CCE. This acquisition is intended to eliminate these conflicts and to make the firm more responsive to changing customer demands. Although Pepsi was the first to control its North American bottlers, Coke's copycat move less than a year later shows that there is little that one of these beverage juggernauts can do that cannot be duplicated by the other. We think that Coke's strategy will nullify some of the competitive advantage that Pepsi had hoped to achieve in its route to market.We believe that Coke's extensive distribution network and strong brands in almost every nonalcoholic beverage category should allow the firm to successfully generate excess returns on invested capital for years to come. We recommend buying the stock at about 15 times forward earnings, and thanks to its strong competitive advantages, we think that Coke should trade at a premium to other consumer staples firms.
ValuationFollowing the company's healthy first-quarter results and continued solid execution on its 2020 vision, we are increasing our fair value estimate for Coca-Cola to $73 from $69. Our fair value estimate implies fiscal 2012 price/earnings of 18 times, enterprise value/EBITDA of 13 times, a free cash flow yield of 5%, and a dividend yield of 3%. We believe that Coca-Cola's wide economic moat and opportunities for continued growth merit above-average valuation multiples.Volume and pricing are key drivers of our valuation model. We forecast Coca-Cola's top line to grow roughly 5.5% per year over the next decade, driven by roughly 3%-4% volume growth and 1%-2% pricing growth. Additionally, we believe that the company's operating margins should range between 25% and 27.5%, in line with Coke's average adjusted operating margin during the last five years. From our perspective, EPS growth should outpace top-line growth going forward as the firm utilizes the substantial free cash flow it generates to reduce debt and repurchase shares. Our estimates for Coke's revenue growth and EPS growth are within the range of the company's long-term targets of 5%-6% CAGR for the top line and 7%-9% CAGR for long-term EPS growth. For 2012, we expect Coca-Cola to generate about $49 billion in revenue and $4.11 per share.
RiskCoke's sales and profitability could be negatively affected beyond our forecasts by greater than expected increases in commodity prices, particularly for raw materials such as sugar, cocoa, and oranges. Ownership of the company's North American distribution platform will increase Coke's exposure to other commodities such as aluminum and plastic resins; the deal is also not without integration risk. With about 70% of revenue being generated outside the U.S., the firm is subject to currency and geopolitical risks in the overseas markets in which it operates. Sales of Coke's carbonated drinks could be hurt by negative publicity regarding the health concerns associated with drinks with high sugar content, and volumes of Coke's sugary drinks could be constrained should governments look to increase taxes on soda.
Management & StewardshipCoca-Cola generally has a high standard of management stewardship. We attribute the firm's consistent execution during the difficult operating environment over the past several years to strong leadership from the top and a very deep bench. We are also impressed with management's focus on the company's 2020 vision, which emphasizes making the best decisions to grow the business over the long term, not just the next quarter.Muhtar Kent is currently Coca-Cola's CEO and chairman. In general, we prefer to see these roles separated. Executive compensation is generous, but incentive-based pay does appear to be aligned with the long-term interests of shareholders. While six of Coca-Cola's 15 board members have sat on the board for more than two decades, the firm has recently added some high-profile new board members, including Howard Buffett (Warren Buffett's son), Evan Greenberg (CEO of ACE Limited ACE), and former Chicago mayor Richard Daley.We applaud the firm for its adoption of majority voting, allowing shareholders to vote against the election of a director, but we think that allowing cumulative voting would further enhance the rights of the small shareholder.
Overview
Financial Health: Coca-Cola is financially healthy. Although the acquisition of CCE's North American bottling business measurably increased the firm's debt, interest expense, and pension expense, we believe that the firm's strong cash flows will enable the company to meet all of its financial obligations, invest for future growth, and grow its dividend. We forecast EBITDA to cover interest expense more than 40 times, on average, over the next decade, and forecast the firm to generate free cash flow of about 19% of revenue over our 10-year explicit forecast period. We currently assign Coke an issuer rating of AA-, implying very low default risk.
Profile: Coca-Cola is the world's largest nonalcoholic beverage company. The firm, which sells a variety of sparkling and still beverages, generates 70% of its revenue and about 80% of its operating profit from outside the United States. Coke's core brands include: Coca-Cola, Sprite, Dasani, Powerade, and Minute Maid. Following the asset swap with CCE, Coke now owns about 80% of its distribution in North America.